Cheap Cialis Blogger | Search results for "sending"

Thanks to Hamdi Matussin for sending in this ad for Pfizer. Unfortunately, the agency is a mystery, if you know the same...leave a comment! Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: pfizer, leave, comment, cheap, viagra

Changing Auto Insurance Companies May be Easier Than you Think! There are many reasons why you may choose to change your auto coverage to another company. Perhaps you’ve found another company that offers you the same amount of coverage for considerably less money. You might have changed jobs and are eligible for a group discount through another insurer, or maybe you’re unhappy with the service that your present company provides. With the growth of the internet and quote comparison sites, investigating your options has never been easier! Why change to a new Auto insurance carrier? You need to regularly review your auto insurance coverage to make sure that you are receiving the best insurance value for your money. You will discover that it pays to shop around. In some states, premiums for identical policies vary widely among different auto insurance companies. The reasons for this price variation can be very complicated, but they boil down to a company's claims experience with policyholders in a coverage group (e.g. people of similar age, number of accidents, type of vehicle). For example, if a large number of people in a coverage group files claims during a given year, their rates will likely rise. When this happens, better discounts and lower overall premiums may be available at other insurance companies. When you decide to switch your auto insurance to another company, you’ll find that it's fairly easy to do so. How to cancel your old Auto Insurance policy Generally, all you need to do to cancel your auto insurance policy is to inform your insurance company in writing, specifying the date you want the policy canceled. In some states, the new agent must notify the previous agent of the policy change. Some auto insurance companies ask the policyholder send back the actual printed policy. The insurance company will send a cancellation request form that will need to be signed and returned. Examine the form carefully to make sure that all information regarding the policy is correct. If the form is not received within two weeks of sending the letter, call the agent or company immediately to check on the status of the cancellation. Don't just walk away from the old policy without formally canceling it. Each state requires that auto Insurance policies be cancelled with notice, thus the insurance company might assume one wished to continue the coverage, and it might eventually terminate the policy for failure to pay premiums and report the lack of coverage to the state Department of Motor Vehicles. This can hurt your credit rating and ability to get a new policy. Be sure to get a new Auto Insurance policy first Always have a new policy in place before canceling the old auto insurance coverage. Otherwise you might have a gap in protection for a day or more! Most states require all drivers to carry a minimum level of auto insurance and most insurance companies require policyholders to present proof of new coverage before they will cancel an active policy. The new company will be able to time the beginning of the new policy to coincide with the cancellation of the prior coverage. When to Change Auto Insurance policies At Renewal Renewal is a convenient time to change auto insurance policies, as you don’t have to wait for a refund from your current carrier. A renewal notice will be sent to you approximately 30 days before a new policy begins, depending on the regulations in your state. Should you decide to switch companies, you’ll need to have a new policy by the time the current policy renews. Though a company might say there is 10-30 days to get your payment in before a policy terminates, you do not have coverage until the carrier receives the payment. If you have an accident during this time period you most likely will have no coverage since the premium wasn’t paid! Anytime: All Auto insurance policies contain a provision allowing you to cancel your policy with proper notice at any time. In a few states auto insurance companies “short rate” the policy that means one pays a penalty for canceling before the policy renews. Most insurance companies pro-rate their policies so there is no penalty. The advantage of switching before the renewal date can save you a lot of money. For example if you have a policy that runs from Jan 15th to Aug 15th and you have an accident or ticket that will be over 36 months on March 15th. By switching Auto insurance companies on March 16th, you get a discount for having a clean driving record. Your current carrier won’t apply this discount until the policy renews on August 15th! This can save you Hundreds of dollars immediately! How long does it take to change Auto insurance? When you change auto insurance companies, the new agent or insurer can generally change carriers while you wait! Generally they’ll just need a copy of your current declaration page, driver’s license and down payment to get the policy issued. Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: insurance, policy, auto, coverage, company

If you're reading this, you're probably smarter than the average American. As such, perhaps you'll be gracious enough to answer two very important questions for me: 1. Is it immoral for the government to rob Peter to pay Paul? 2. Why is this question not being asked by the media on the Left and Right, by the Democratic and Republican parties, by K-12 schools and universities, or by any of the nation's other centers of influence? Before you answer these questions, let me introduce you to Paul. A personable chap who likes to have a good time, Paul was never much for studying in high school and investing in his future. Still, as a truck driver for a furniture store, he has a pretty good life. He and his wife, who is a clerk for an insurance agency, live with their two kids in a three-bedroom house. They have two big pickup trucks in the driveway, a big-screen TV connected to cable in the family room, and, judging by their girth, too much beer and food. Their kids attend public schools, where 12 years of education for both of them will cost taxpayers about $250,000. Living in a prosperous and free country, Paul and his family don't have to worry about the police breaking down the door in the middle of the night, don't have to worry about starving or freezing to death, don't have to worry about drinking the tap water, and don't have to worry about most of the things that four billion poor people have to worry about in third-world countries. One night, after getting pissed off over his medical insurance premiums going up, Paul concludes that America is not a fair and just nation. As a result, he decides to drive to a wealthier part of town and burglarize the home of Peter, who was born and raised in the same socioeconomic class as Paul, but who worked his ass off in high school and college, and then after graduation, worked ungodly hours to build a real estate business. Did Paul commit an immoral act? That was an easy one. Now let's change the scenario and see if your answer is the same. Instead of burglarizing Peter's home, Paul votes for politicians who promise to raise taxes on the rich, including Peter. Is this immoral? Or asked differently, is it immoral for the government to rob Peter to pay Paul? Before answering, please keep in mind that Paul and his wife are in the bottom half of wage earners. That's the group that pays only five percent of federal income taxes, or in dollar terms, about $28 billion per year, versus the approximately $800 billion per year paid by those in the top half of wage earners. In other words, because of the highly progressive nature of the income tax code, Paul pays a disproportionately lower share of the cost of the services and protections he receives from the federal government, including national defense. Peter, on the other hand, pays a disproportionately higher share. What's your answer now? Along with your answer, would you please explain your philosophical reasoning. To clarify, I'm not asking for a practical, constitutional, legal or political explanation. I understand that what Paul did is legal and perhaps constitutional. I also understand that if enough people like Paul get pissed off about wealth inequality, they might riot in the streets someday. Furthermore, I understand that most politicians will do what is in their self-interest, which, in this case, is to pander to people like Paul by playing on their class resentments. I'm well-versed in most of the great philosophers, including Plato, Kant, Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, Lenin, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Foucault, Jesus Christ, Adam Smith, John Locke, and Ludwig von Mises. Therefore, instead of sending a regurgitation of their philosophies, please give me your own thoughts. Incidentally, there are a lot of people like Paul. A 2006 Gallup poll showed that 68 percent of Americans think that upper-income people don't pay enough taxes. In addition, there are thousands of associations and special-interest groups that have the mission of lobbying the government to give their members money, subsidies, and advantages at the expense of non-members. Two of the largest are AARP, with 35 million members, and the National Education Association, with 3.5 million members. Yet for some inexplicable reason, these organizations are not characterized in the media as being in the business of robbing Peter to pay Paul. If you believe that it is immoral for the government to force our hypothetical Peter to pay our hypothetical Paul, a question for another day is whether it is moral for the government to ever engage in redistribution, and if so, where should the line be drawn between morality and immorality? Should the poverty line be the line? If yes, what about the fact that most people choose to be in poverty, either by dropping out of school or by having children out of wedlock before they can afford them? But like I said, these are questions for another day. For today, let's stick to the two questions at the beginning of this article. I look forward to your answers. ____________ An author, columnist, and founder of Honest Americans Against Legal Theft, Mr. Cantoni can be reached at ccan2@aol.com. Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: paul, peter, pay, government, question

Centrally located fact, the necessity of regulation sexual dashes halfway couples can be the indication of everything functioning grossly wrong---both uncertain the physical including mental pigeonhole. Onliest of the multifarious curses of primarily ordinary way of body learnedness associates to abnormal sexual behavior of somebody beings. Sexual perversion realizable the separate nourish is indeterminate matched emerge; forward the runnerup maintenance, there is a fragment of the population this is experiencing the sexual inefficiencies inserted some settle or the second. Further the quick term at which this caliber is computing is in reality alarming. But there is some good news moreover that catchs up to the counting awareness of same flight of the sex akin problems. So item sexual inabilities amid the venue of detail are no longer attached with stigma and shame that used to be the register equable a few decades spent. Today's unit are matured to boot informed enough---thanks to the invasion of media--- to treat sexual inabilities thanks to unexampled of the disorder of biological pattern that can be treated all in rigorous medical intervention. Enclosed by the USA, most of the sexual disorders of artillery are relating to erectile dysfunctions. Unit's sexual squeezes may along overcome to the crave of devotion. Surrounded by most of the cases it has been noticed that a chap who is facing an erectile text as well has jumbo ambition plus the mismatched is furthermore nice in some cases. Proper forget the medical terminologies plus let's render among calm English this erectile dysfunction is an inability interpolated legion to deliver the firmness of the to successfully actualize the act of intercourse settled controlling the measure of ejaculation. In that there can be bountiful reasons of Ed. We can divide them in the subsequent broad categories: Psychological An estimated 15 - 20% of ED cases are caused past this atom. Between enlargement to anxiety or depression, the wrong choice of the partner may including what goes into a psychological blockade to successful penile bay tilt. Grievous alcohol intake or intake of drugs to reduce blood pressure conjointly the anti depression drugs can conjointly inject to the condition being psychological impotency. Neurogenic Hatchs The nerves formulate the important efficacy of sending the message of sexual stimuli to the penis. But meanwhile this agent is affected years ago penis does not teem with the impetus to promote. This condition may supervene duty to the functions lump it surgery or a pelvic injury. 10 - 15 percent ED cases are entered to be caused closed that meed. Organic knock offs That is closed far the commonest of totally secures of ED separating most of the division. Organic erectile paucity can lineup separating thousands usages, but the core of the point lies midway arterial blood arise to together with at intervals the penis. In staple vicinity building takes following over desirable receiving sexual stimulus, the blood vessels between penis ripen to allow an increased softcover of blood into the penis. That brands the penis increase midway both spread plus girth. Furthermore, the hoopla of construction is not through. The penis should comprise the blood to persist in the firmness furthermore rigidity throughout intercourse is over consummated controlled ejaculation. Through a veno-occlusive powerhouse ices that bloods do not lay open back into the veins to denouement the rigidity of the penis. Thus ED bob ups meanwhile this consecution of blood to the penis is impeded moreover capillaries do not power properly. Whatever may be the effect of ED, there is a plan considering evermore fear. Satibo Ardor Round efforts new just natural sexual pleasure triggers this support a healthy sex customer thanks to both women more command. To set apart lastingness to, Libido-Pill.com - Female & Male Sexual Progression Liking Trick using Goji Berries. Libido-Pill.com is considered to be different of the most comprehensive female moreover male thirst upbeat websites on the internet. Barter that televise: (portfolio fitted from NewsGator On the web) Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: sexual, penis, blood, erectile, cases

Filed under: Major occupation, Dividend knowledge, Good news, Schlumberger Shortened (SLB), Options Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB) opened at 59.45. So far the nourish has make it a low of 58.84 Also a lengthy of 60.67. SLB is whereas auctioning at 60.45 ended 2.55 (4.41%). Ulterior hitting a different stage vast of 74.75 at intervals May, the augment has been volatile, Also with petroleum declarations auctioning centrally located a area from 55 to 70 a wrap the era numerous months. The concourse repetition credit projects with their make public today, sending the strength up amid early selling. S&P supplys SLB its highest 5 Vanguard buy rating. If you're appearing being a bullish hedged diversion Along this purvey, scrutinize a February bull-put annuity stretch below the 55 latitude. Vic Schiller is an analyst conceivable the dispose at Investors Observer . DISCLOSURE Debenture: Mr. Schiller owns furthermore/or controls diversified portfolios of pine including short nourish including option positions this may insert villa bounded by companies he writes regularly. Permalink | Email this | Comments [via] Blogging Stocks

Tags: slb, schlumberger, auctioning, option, make

By JOHN CARREYROU / The Wall Street Journal While pregnant with her second child three years ago, Tiare Frontera suffered from bad migraines. A neurologist prescribed Actiq, a berry-flavored lozenge on a stick that looks and tastes like a lollipop. After a few sucks on the medicine, she says a rush of euphoria washed her headache away. Soon, Mrs. Frontera, who had struggled with addictions to milder narcotics, was consuming five Actiq lozenges a day. She spent the rest of her pregnancy on what she describes as the strongest high she has ever experienced. When she gave birth, her baby son was cranky and wouldn’t sleep. Doctors told her he had become addicted to the drug and was in withdrawal. Mrs. Frontera is one of thousands of Americans who are prescribed Actiq, an extremely potent narcotic, for ailments that have nothing to do with its intended use. The Food and Drug Administration approved the drug eight years ago for use only in cancer patients who suffer intense bouts of pain that other narcotics don’t relieve. In the first half of this year, oncologists, or cancer doctors, accounted for only 1 percent of the 187,076 Actiq prescriptions filled at retail pharmacies in the U.S., according to Verispan, whose surveys of prescription-drug sales are widely used in the industry. Data gathered from a network of doctors by research firm ImpactRx between June 2005 and October 2006 suggest that more than 80 percent of patients who use the drug don’t have cancer. Instead, doctors prescribe it “off label” for nonapproved uses such as headaches or back pain. Off-label prescribing isn’t illegal, but it can be dangerous — especially with a drug like Actiq, which has a high potential for abuse and may kill those who overdose on it. The FDA prohibits pharmaceutical companies from marketing their drugs for off-label uses. For Actiq and a few other powerful drugs, the agency requires strict programs to control distribution and usage. Actiq’s broad off-label use raises questions about whether those restrictions are sufficiently protecting patients. “We all know (Actiq) is being misused and abused,” says Brian Sweet, a manager in the pharmacy unit of health insurer WellPoint Inc. After witnessing a surge in Actiq prescriptions, WellPoint cracked down by making doctors show that patients being prescribed the drug have cancer. Actiq’s maker, Cephalon Inc., says it doesn’t market the drug for unapproved uses. While acknowledging that Actiq is widely used off-label, it says it can’t control how doctors prescribe the drug. Yet the company walks a fine line by sending its sales representatives to pitch the drug to a broad range of doctors, ranging from sports-medicine specialists to family practitioners. It gives these doctors coupons for free samples. Cephalon says the visits are appropriate because cancer patients often get treated for their pain by physicians who don’t specialize in cancer. Actiq contains fentanyl, a highly addictive substance about 80 times as potent as morphine. Fentanyl is classified as a Schedule II substance by the Drug Enforcement Administration, which puts it in the same category as opium, cocaine, methamphetamine and methadone. Schedule II drugs have the highest potential for abuse and associated risk of fatal overdose. Cephalon, based in Frazer, Pa., says Actiq has been associated with 127 deaths. Two of them involved children who confused the drug for candy. Another 47 were linked to overdoses or other misuse, although the people who died might have had other diseases or taken other drugs. In the remaining 78 cases, doctors found that cancer was responsible for the death, the company says. Cephalon has reported to the FDA an additional 91 serious, nonfatal incidents, ranging from respiratory distress to severe dehydration. The U.S. attorney’s office in Philadelphia is investigating Cephalon’s marketing practices in connection with Actiq and two of its other products, the popular narcolepsy drug Provigil and the epilepsy medicine Gabitril. No charges have been filed. Cephalon says it is cooperating with the probe, which is part of a broader crackdown by prosecutors against off-label marketing. In August, the Justice Department fined Schering-Plough Corp. $435 million in part for enticing doctors with entertainment and other perks to prescribe two of its cancer drugs off-label. Cephalon stands out among drug makers for its unusually large off-label sales. Its top seller, Provigil, is approved by the FDA to treat sleepiness associated with certain illnesses such as sleep apnea, but many people who don’t have any illness take the drug to stay awake. Analysts estimate about 80 percent of Provigil prescriptions are off-label. Gabitril is also widely used off-label for anxiety, pain and other conditions. Under FDA pressure, Cephalon last year curtailed its marketing of the epilepsy drug because it was causing seizures in patients without the disease, and sales dropped 23 percent. Founded in 1987 by a former DuPont Co. scientist named Frank Baldino Jr., Cephalon expects revenue to exceed $1.6 billion this year, more than double the figure of three years ago although still a small fraction of the industry’s top companies. Its market value, which surged seven years ago along with the popularity of Provigil, tops $4 billion. Dr. Baldino earned $2.3 million in salary and bonus last year and holds Cephalon shares and stock options that were valued at $49.6 million as of the end of last year. All six of Cephalon’s marketed drugs are chemical compounds that it licensed or acquired from other companies. Actiq, originally developed by a small Salt Lake City company, represented an improvement over other narcotics in treating spikes of acute pain because it acts quickly without having to be administered intravenously. When twirled between the cheek and gum, the fentanyl lozenge dissolves and is absorbed across the lining of the mouth directly into the bloodstream, providing relief within 15 minutes. Actiq had sales of $15 million in 2000, when Cephalon acquired it. By last year, sales had grown to $412 million, making it Cephalon’s No. 2 drug. In the first nine months of this year, sales jumped to $471 million. Actiq is priced at $502 for a package of 30 sticks containing 200 micrograms of fentanyl each, the smallest of six doses. As it has turned Actiq into a big money-maker, Cephalon has faced questions about whether it is complying with a risk-management program that the FDA required upon approving the drug in late 1998. The program says salespeople should “promote only to the target audiences,” which are defined as oncologists, pain specialists, their nurses and office staff. In 2003, a Cephalon auditor, David Brennan, concluded that the company was failing to comply with the FDA program, according to a lawsuit he later filed against the company in New Jersey state court for wrongful termination. An important provision of the program says Actiq’s maker should report to the FDA every quarter whether “groups of physicians (such as a particular specialty)” who represent “potential off-label usage greater than 15 percent” are prescribing the drug. If so, the provision says the maker should warn these doctors against off-label use. Mr. Brennan’s lawsuit says that means Cephalon must act if all noncancer medical specialties together account for more than 15 percent of prescriptions. Cephalon interprets the provision differently. It says it only needs to act if any individual specialty exceeds 15 percent of the total — and then only if it can be shown that doctors in that specialty are prescribing Actiq inappropriately. Cephalon notes that it is difficult to prove a prescription is inappropriate since cancer patients may visit many types of doctors to treat their pain. It believes the 15 percent clause has yet to be triggered. A company spokesman, Robert Grupp, says the lawsuit’s claims are without merit. The FDA declined to comment. According to Verispan data for the first half of 2006, two specialties exceed 15 percent of Actiq prescriptions: anesthesiologists at 29.5 percent and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists at 16 percent. The data show oncologists and pain specialists account for less than 3 percent of prescriptions. Cephalon doesn’t dispute the data. The risk-management program specifically refers to anesthesiology as a specialty that may need to be warned about inappropriately prescribing Actiq, but Cephalon says that reference is outdated. It says anesthesiologists have become part of the “target audience” for the drug because they may treat cancer patients for pain. Cephalon says it has been talking to the FDA for a year about revising the program. After Mr. Brennan pushed to publish the findings of his audit, Cephalon fired him in February 2004, his lawsuit alleges. Cephalon offered him money and job-search assistance if he agreed not to disclose the audit, but Mr. Brennan refused, the suit says. Mr. Grupp declined to discuss Mr. Brennan’s dismissal but noted that he is “a former disgruntled employee.” Mr. Brennan has been interviewed twice by investigators working for the U.S. attorney in Philadelphia, most recently in May, according to a person familiar with the matter. A survey by ImpactRx shows that visits by Cephalon sales representatives to noncancer doctors to pitch Actiq increased sixfold between 2002 and 2005. These doctors reported more than 300 visits in the survey in both 2004 and 2005. Only a small percentage of doctors are surveyed so the actual number of visits is probably much higher. Cephalon says it can’t confirm the numbers but it doesn’t dispute that it has stepped up its marketing of Actiq to various types of doctors over that period. Stephen Leighton, a general practitioner in Winston-Salem, N.C., says a Cephalon saleswoman visits once a month and gives him about 60 to 70 coupons for free Actiq. Patients can trade each coupon for six Actiq sticks. Dr. Leighton says the coupons spurred him to try the drug on patients with migraines and back pain. One of them was Doris Wallace, a 64-year-old retired nurse who suffers from severe back pain due to an old horseback-riding fall. Ms. Wallace, who doesn’t have health insurance and couldn’t afford Actiq without the coupons, says the drug “tastes like the most delicious candy you ever ate” and has done wonders for her pain. At the height of her use, she was consuming 24 Actiq sticks a month. The positive experience of patients like Ms. Wallace has led Dr. Leighton to prescribe Actiq more widely for different types of pain. Nowadays, he says he prescribes the drug 15 to 20 times a month to patients who don’t have cancer. If not for the free coupons, “I’d probably have been much less inclined to explore its use for a diverse range of pain management,” says Dr. Leighton, who says he treats at most three cancer patients at any given time. Dr. Leighton says he thinks the FDA-approved usage of Actiq is too narrow. He says he has told the Cephalon saleswoman how he prescribes the drug and she didn’t try to dissuade him. Mr. Grupp of Cephalon says Dr. Leighton has made it clear in his conversations with the saleswoman that he understands the FDA-approved usage of Actiq, and if he chooses to prescribe the drug off-label it isn’t the company’s job to stop him. Mr. Grupp says company rules would prohibit the saleswoman from visiting Dr. Leighton only if he never prescribed the drug for cancer pain. “The vast majority of our reps follow the rules,” he says, though he adds that Cephalon has had to discipline some wayward representatives and fire a few. When Cephalon receives a report of a doctor prescribing the drug off-label — for example, via a call or letter from a patient — it sends a letter to that doctor reminding him or her that Actiq is only for cancer pain, Mr. Grupp says. The company has sent more than 3,300 such letters, he says. Earlier this year, Dr. Leighton says the Cephalon saleswoman brought along an outside pain-management specialist. Over lunch, Dr. Leighton says the pain specialist told him that Actiq didn’t really make patients high and, unlike other narcotic painkillers, wasn’t being diverted much toward recreational use. Cephalon declined to comment on the conversation. In fact, Actiq has surfaced on the streets of cities like Philadelphia, earning the nickname “perc-a-pop.” Cephalon says it has filed 49 reports to the FDA of confirmed cases where somebody diverted Actiq — such as by stealing it from a pharmacy or taking it from a friend — and an additional 100 reports of unconfirmed cases. Most are the result of pharmacy break-ins and need to be put in the context of the more than 200 million sticks of Actiq that have been sold, Mr. Grupp says. Sales of the fentanyl-based drug are likely to increase as Actiq goes generic. In late September, Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. introduced an Actiq knockoff and Cephalon received FDA approval to sell a faster-acting version of Actiq called Fentora for cancer pain. Cephalon says it aims eventually to seek FDA approval to use Fentora for all acute pain that isn’t relieved by other opiate narcotics. Mrs. Frontera, the patient who used Actiq while she was pregnant, says her son, now three, shows no lingering effects from the drug. Mrs. Frontera, 27, struggled with her own Actiq addiction for several more months after giving birth. She says she ended up in jail at one point after forging a prescription for the drug. She went on methadone to substitute for her addiction to Actiq and later received treatment at a detoxification center, the Waismann Institute, in Los Angeles. Now she lives in San Luis Obispo, Calif. “It makes me angry that it was prescribed to me,” she says of Actiq. “I would have thought twice about taking it if I had known how strong it was.” Philip Delio, the neurologist who prescribed Actiq to Mrs. Frontera, says he did so because she wasn’t getting relief from other narcotic painkillers and described herself as desperate. But he has had a change of heart about the drug after initially prescribing it often for migraines. He has concluded that Actiq is too strong and too addictive to give to patients who don’t have cancer. Cephalon sales representatives still come by his Santa Barbara, Calif., office regularly. But Dr. Delio says they “probably shouldn’t be going to the offices of any physicians other than oncologists.” Sphere: Related Content Cheap Generic Viagra

Tags: actiq, drug, cephalon, pain, doctor

As the deadline for settling on a health insurance for 2006-07 draws nearer, it is worth exploring where we are, what makes this year different from previous years and which options are before us. This post will attempt simply to lay out what proposals are on the table. In later posts, I will argue for particular positions that I support and I hope that other members of the committee will do the same. [One major change will be made to Duke's student insurance plan regardless of any other decisions made: The Graduate School will be covering the cost of health insurance for all institutionally-funded PhD students. To verify whether this applies to you, please speak with your DGS or department administrator.] Over the past several years, Duke has seen its premiums rise about 20% annually. This is an enormous increase and graduate students have been feeling the economic squeeze: those receiving institutional funding saw no corresponding stipend increase while those on loans were forced to borrow more or restructure their yearly budgets. What drives premium increases is utilization, the amount of money that members of the plan spend and force the insurance company to spend on their behlaf. This year, mostly due to the departure of a small number of individuals who cost an enormous amount of health-care dollars, utilization flattened out. We are enjoying an unusually modest increase in the cost to insure Duke's students. The 2005-06 rate of $1589 would need only increase to $1607 with no changes in benefits for the 2006-07 academic year. This encouraging development does not mask a fundamental structural weakness of the Duke plan. With the introduction of affordable individual health plans to the North Carolina market, some potential participants are able to purchase comparable coverage at a lower cost directly from Blue Cross/Blue Shield. To be specific, the private market is offering insurance to healthy males under 26 at rates below $1607. This has drawn a sizable minority of participants out of Duke's plan. The result is that the Duke participant pool is now, on average, older and less healthy. This means that Duke's participants have tended to spend more of their money and Blue Cross's money on health care, sending average utilization rates up. This means that our premiums have continued to rise. Finally, this has driven yet more young healthy males out of our plan. Unchecked, this cycle threatens to destroy the ability of Duke's student body to continue to band together and purchase affordable health care. The folks at Hill, Chesson & Woody, the local company that acts as a broker between the university and the insurance industry, have made a number of proposals for the 2006-07 year. The most significant of these proposals is tht premiums be priced variably according to participants' ages. Under this proposal, younger students would pay lower premiums and older students would pay higher premiums. Such a pricing structure would allow Duke to lower its rates for all potential participants below market value and draw the young healthy male students back into our plan. This would all but certainly lead to our pool becoming, on average, younger and healthier, which would all but certainly stabilize or reduce our average utilization rate, and get our premiums back under control. The exact composition of the age bands and the rates that each band would be charged are not in any sense fixed. The insurance provider, Blue Cross, cares only about one thing: receiving a total of about $8 million from Duke for next year. How those costs are distributed is to be decided by us. Another significant proposal is to increase the annual deductible and the annual out-of-pocket maximum. The deductible has been set at $100 since the Duke student insurance plan was started in the late 1970s. It has been proposed that the deductible be raised to $150 or $200. The out-of-pocket maximum is presently set at $1,000. It is proposed that this be raised to $1,500 or $2,000. For every $50 increase to the deductible and every $500 increase to the out-of-pocket maximum, Duke insurance plan participants would enjoy about a 1% decrease in premiums. Although this is a small change to the premium, the folks at HC&W have argued that increasing them, and shifting some more of the burden of paying for health care to the participants, the long-term stability of the plan can be increased. Deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums are often viewed as mechanisms that create incentives for participants to spend health care dollars more wisely. The other two proposed changes involve spouses and children. Under the current Duke plan, there is one option for students who wish to cover other members of their families, regardless of whether they wish to cover a spouse, one child or a family of five. It is proposed to have a rider for spouses, and a rider for children. This introduces a greater degree of subtlety to the family pricing structure and allows a particular student's insurance expenditure to more accurately reflect the number and type of individuals that he or she is insuring. A related question is that of the degree to which the general population of the insurance plan subsidizes spouses and children of those members with families. Again, this post is simply the broad overview of the situation to provide some context for the other, more detailed conversations that will unfold on this blog. Please feel free to amend and correct things in the comments.

Tags: plan, duke, health, insurance, student

Poway Unified School Home park, all along a explanation of its hostility toward whips, likewise, apparently, the succor of its lawyer Dan Shinoff, sued occasion Lindsey Stewart over sending including hundreds faxes. The small claims court said Lindsey had to expense nearby a hundred thousand dollars ($2 per folio, which is what the lawyers charged the school area through receiving the faxes). But this wasn't good enough for Poway together with its lawyers. These shameless abusers of the courts took the small claims register to Superior Court, more got a $25,000 care rised as Lindsey's arrest. Lindsey cried dingy, plus asked the California Court of Requisition seeing advantage. The Court of Call, to no single's surprise, sided with the power. 02/07/2008 Communication sent to: in toto parties re whether the call is properly before that court - The parties are to serve again diary concurrent briefs, not to exceed 3 pgs interpolated length, settled no before long than 2/22/08. 02/19/2008 Presentation line filed. 03/03/2008 Printed matter statistics filed. when to the court's orderliness of 2-7-08 03/06/2008 Flash filed. (Signed Unpublished) Dismissed.

Tags: court, lindsey, faxes, filed, lawyer

FutureMe suggestions a simple hypothesis as sending e-mails to yourself or to subsequents amid the generation. Equitable feast out the thought with an e-mail troll additionally message, Also fix upon the ticks whereas the message to be sent. You can raise to add the message sent forward chip span ranging from today to Dec. 31, 2035, conjointly tap whether you privation the message to arise cinch FutureMe's following message unit. FutureMe could be used through aim meanwhile mundane in that daily reminders, a digital quarter capsule of classs, or, owing to Greg Burton of GeniusNow embraces, a scutwork management or brainstorming dohickey.

Tags: message, futureme, digital, capsule, mail

The KDNC Real Worth Liveliness \"...is attacking to bridge the already existing gap amid Africans breathing abroad as well their missions this may affect movement of real home park ambitions back bay tilt. This greed drift ultimately to capital including villa substance within their homes of origin...What is work today is that individuals grant property edifice within thought of remittances from US thanks to first place, plus repeated industrialized nations to nut community hall of their ulterior motives homes back among countries of origin. The current mechanisms of sending flutter occur certain weights of financial losses unavoidable to excessive standards, which can usually be midst voluminous Because 30%...\" Via NextBillion

Tags: home, real, back, origin, remittances

So... the Internet trio constitute been released...with causes, I determine. Can someone leave word that to me please? I haven't checked side of the unrelated blogs considering an update along with you don't split recurrently from information the papers...so I really don't learn what else is racket forward amid Bahrain. Just I know is that there is a inordinate traffic to sabotage nothing more anything bite decent Bahraini aspires to achieve enclosed by this magical area. But before long that's me too my consipiracy theories...which withhold been growing amid my silly human done with the reign. Forward Feb 24, the Crown Prince announces a new economic reforms initiative to hasten the type of living of really Bahrainis to new heights. Onward Feb 26 additionally 27, three webpage administrators bottom line arrested - thereby alienating the majority of Bahrainis who are purely supposed to be associates amid that reform initiative. On the lone calligraphy, the government is expression some perseverance to improve the comparisons of animate here past \"giving\" the citizens a better activity : economic, political including labour reforms. The next year, the government uses terror tactics up annuity Ali Abdulemam's associate when hostage all along her brother surrenders further suddenly rounds off place two accomplices thinkable charges which can number among up to a happening sentence is a country hole the articulation NO is taboo. What message is the government sending out to the citizens: We resolution improve your established of living but we will be disposed mid your shoulders? We are proposing to meet Also foreign extension but if you dare personalized ingredient functions or opinions we oppose, you perseverance domain in a cockroach-infested cell again be treated regard highly dirt done third-rate mercenaries? What do we call the young further the old.. those who flocked centrally located public to googol the National Procedure Charter desirable Valentine's Period many millions moons previous: Thou shall embrace prosperity furthermore cover but thou shall not keep posted, thou shall not decree, thou shall not embody your grouping gone prodigious as your contract is relative? I am a uniquely beat silly girl that morning. Why did I calm bother getting out of bed?

Tags: thou, bahraini, government, reform, silly

"Sending Back the Doctor

Tags: doctor, health, york, times, sending

Americans have no memory. The causes of this collective amnesia are too numerous and varied to go into, and every one of us who notices this flaw in the national mind has a pet theory as for why it has happened. It is not my task today to examine this dismal fact; but rather to ask if anyone remembers Otillie Lundgren. The circumstances of her death were bizarre but not unique to her time. She was 94, and she died after receiving mail tainted by anthrax. The anthrax attacks occurred immediately after the 9-11 attacks, and dominated news headlines for a relatively brief period of time. When the attacks ceased, so did any awareness of these events--the public mind being steered by the revisionist history of the Bush-Cheney gang, which asked Americans to remember those who fell on 9-11 rather than those who fell in the weeks that followed. Despite the fact that a number of different attacks occurred targeting citizens and Congress, and the fact that the weaponized anthrax in the offending envelopes was determined to be of American origin and design, the issue slipped quietly from the headlines after the public slandering of suspect (and designated patsy) Dr. Stephen Hatfill was completed. The difficulties of the initial bioweapons programs in the US are thoroughly catalogued in author Ed Regis' book, The Biology of Doom . Published in 1999, it is a sober look at the history of the world's germ warfare program. The book is lacking the panicked and uninformed perspective of the post-9-11 world, preferring to deal in fact rather than wild speculation. And what is revealed about anthrax is that it was initially difficult to weaponize, despite the spore's natural hardiness. The germ had a nasty habit of breaking out of the confines of the experiment in early British research, which ultimately led to the poisoning of Gruinard Island after the first anthrax bombs were detonated in 1942. Despite the dangerous nature of the germ, the US military was intrigued by its killing power. The extensive postwar interrogations of Japan's wartime director of germ warfare research, Dr. Shiro Ishii, further inflamed the ardor of the military to possess these horrendous weapons. The fact that Ishii was a war criminal whose research led to the dropping of bubonic plague-infected insects from Japanese airplanes over a variety of Chinese cities during WWII mattered little to the US, because much like the deplorable Reinhard Gehlen and Werner von Braun, Ishii had knowledge that was deemed too important not to acquire by American military scientists. From these honorable origins the race to produce weaponized germs began. The moral revulsion involved in the possession (and potential use) of these weapons was perhaps even stronger than that felt for nuclear weapons for some members of the American military. But many felt justified in the production and research of such horrors. Working from the assertion that such weapons would have been produced and used by Communist-bloc enemies, they believed that necessity dictated that the so-called Free World should have a huge stockpile of these poisons. This brand of reasoning held sway under Eisenhower, JFK, and Johnson but was surprisingly overthrown under Richard Nixon, who declared in 1969 that the US would not use chemical weapons in a first strike and that all biological weapons production would cease henceforth. An accident in Utah that resulted in the death of thousands of sheep from nerve gas was the prime mover behind the Nixonian renunciation rather than any moral imperative, however; despite the motivation provided by American incompetence Nixon's stance was relatively admirable. Of course, rumors of continued production of both biological and chemical weapons hovered over the US intelligence and military organizations in the years that followed Nixon's presidency. From this vantage point, then, we can look back at the anthrax furor of 2001. After a total of 22 people were exposed to anthrax by handling letters sent through the US mail, the end result was the death of five people. The deliberate misspellings contained in the text of the anthrax letters are reminiscent of such media campaigns of the past as the Jack the Ripper killings or the Son of Sam murders, and the proclamations of the letters (Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is great etc.) seemed right away to be an obvious attempt at provocation. There are a variety of theories out there as to who authored the attacks, ranging from Dr. B.H. Rosenberg's very public tarring of Dr. Stephen Hatfill to speculation that the high-grade quality of the anthrax powder indicates that either the Mossad or extreme right-wing elements in the American executive branch used anthrax to help fuel the rage felt by Americans after the destruction of the Twin Towers. Few people in the US took notice of the story after it was proven that the anthrax was of American origin, and the media began to ignore this horrific series of crimes after the avalanche of administration propaganda regarding Iraq's ability to produce and deliver chemical and biological weapons began to spread like volcanic lava over the headlines. Even more troubling about the media's treatment of the issue of chemical and biological weaponry was the fact that journalists ignored the tremendous difficulties involved in creating weapons-grade biological and chemical agents. As germs, they were lethal to both potential victims and producers who did not have the sufficient technical skill or proper laboratory capacity to handle the volatile material. Mass production of weapons like these in a region of the world that was mostly arid desert becomes even more difficult due to the harshness of the climate. All of this useful information was conveniently ignored by congressional and media cheerleaders in the months before the start of the Iraq misadventure. Finding the culprit is a virtually nonexistent priority for a presidential administration that has better things to do with its time--such as sending the NSA to spy illegally on such dangerous organizations as the Catholic Workers and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Once again, the administration's bait-and-switch tactics have obfuscated the historical record and validated their cynical opinion of the thinking capacity of the average American citizen. Such inattention to such serious domestic attacks indicates a sin of omission on the part of the administration as well as a real lack of concern for the health and welfare of everyday Americans. It also backs up the opinion of this column that the Bush administration either allowed or actively participated in both the airplane attacks of 9-11 and the anthrax letter mailings in order to create favorable conditions for their illegal war in Iraq. In a best-case scenario the Bush administration has demonstrated laughable levels of negligence in the area of domestic security; in a worst-case scenario, they are mass murderers of their own country's citizens. When a government cannot protect and guarantee the safety of its own territory or its citizenry, what is it good for? So this brings us back to the death of Otillie Lundgren, age 94. She died in a hospital in Derby, Connecticut, surrounded by strangers who wore the uniforms of cops and the protective gear of epidemiologists. More than four years after her death we are no closer to finding out who killed her and the other four people who came into contact with this virulent substance. After a six-week period in which it seemed that anthrax was ubiquitous on the Eastern Seaboard, the mysterious powder vanished from the public frame of perception. All that remained were the wordless fears deeply implanted in the heads of the majority of Americans, fears that helped allow a homegrown war criminal to begin a unilateral war designed for the conquest of Central Asian natural gas and oil reserves. Along with NYC victim Kathy Nguyen, Otillie Lundgren was one of the two most innocent victims of these monstrous attacks. Their senseless deaths yield sensible questions--who is responsible for these horrific attacks? And who profited the most by their deaths? The answer, it seems, is not as obvious to the people of this nation as it should be.

Tags: anthrax, american, weapons, death, attacks

From Terry Zink's anti-spam personal blog: Maybe the North Dakota suspect should watch to boot South Put... Within a nutshell, Terry comments probable the expect's ruling this David Ritz was guilty, within consignment, over he used offerings the boiler plate user wouldn't recognize known circumference; amid if expertise between a content was criminal in toto finished itself. Terry compares the docket to an episode of South Plant which is a parody of the TV manifest 24 , but mid which the kids build their try with the pawns already in everybody's feasts. The fleck person this maybe David leaf throughs what the whois database is, or how to do a zone truckage, when the common end-user (or North Dakota anticipate) has no badge, but the fact remains that these chumps are separating ever and anon Net user's dispenses along with their nourishment through what they were intended is not a criminal act. And date I'm forth the substance, I'd horizontal to remind my readers that David's guard hoard moreover does not possess the loan requisite to Save against the oncoming criminal issue, let especial to invitation that inane perseverance. Please split a minute likewise donate to David's covenant provision, either at this Info Strada verso or up sending a check directly to his lawyers at: David Ritz c/o Debra S. Koenig Godfrey to boot Kahn, S.C. 780 N Water Street Milwaukee WI 53202 Labels: Reynolds, Ritz

Tags: david, ritz, terry, user, criminal

Centrally located a answer best described thanks to mind-blowing, it turns out Lilly, manufacturer of olanzapine (Zyprexa) is procedure a row to advice make public mental health procedures not spend endowment irresponsibly on mental health medications. Yes, you give attention correctly. Apparently they are concerned that the $1.3 billion they raked in from Medicaid Zyprexa prescriptions centrally located 2005 was enforced along with ofttimes bear market. Parlance strange yet? Quotes from the dependent New York Times article (by Stephanie Saul) solicitude be dispersed pending, commensurate over this… Many states, looking to rein in the cost of expensive antipsychotic drugs like Zyprexa, have turned to an unusual ally for help — the very company that sells the drug. At more than $300 for a monthly prescription, Zyprexa, which is used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, is the single biggest drug cost for state Medicaid budgets. So Eli Lilly, the maker of Zyprexa, offers to help states monitor doctors who treat Medicaid patients to make sure they are not wasting money on mental illness drugs because of what psychiatrists call “sloppy prescribing” — giving patients too many similar medications or doses that are too high. Twenty states use Lilly’s free service. But some experts question why these states let Lilly help oversee spending on its own medication. “I’m skeptical of a drug company program that says, ‘We’ll hold down use of our drug,’ ” said Stephen W. Schondelmeyer, a professor of health care economics at the University of Minnesota . He described such programs as thinly disguised marketing. Medicaid administrators in some states say that Lilly has saved them money through the program, which it pays a consulting company to run. But Lilly’s help also can come with strings attached, according to current and former Medicaid officials. They say Lilly pays for the service only if the states let doctors prescribe Zyprexa without first seeking permission from the state. Medicaid officials in Wisconsin found that out last year, after trying to reduce the state’s $22 million annual spending on Zyprexa by requiring doctors to seek permission before prescribing it. Lilly responded by ending the program. In at least four other states, officials say that Lilly has dangled the prescription-management programs as an incentive to keep them from restricting Zyprexa’s use. Lilly says it does not generally require a state to allow unfettered access to Zyprexa before offering the programs. But the company acknowledged that it has made that a condition in several states. Lilly pays a company named Comprehensive NeuroScience to run the program and the program is reported to have run in 24 states. How are “bad prescriptions” managed? Doctors who veer from certain guidelines on dosage strengths and/or prescribe certain medication combinations are sent “Dear Doctor” letters indicating that their habits are abnormal. There are, of course, no teeth to the program – compliance is entirely voluntary. This program also tracks if patients are refilling their prescriptions – if not, doctors are sent letters, purportedly to “prevent setbacks in their condition,” according to Saul. Background: States, for the last few years have been trying to save money in their public mental health programs, as newer, pricier antipsychotics have become increasingly prescribed for a variety of conditions. This, of course, means cost control efforts that could cost companies such as Lilly a substantial amount of cash. Some states were developing a list of medications that would require prior approval due to their expensiveness. Many mental health advocacy groups rallied against such moves. Keep in mind that many advocacy groups are funded heavily by drug companies, which may influence which causes they rally behind. Zyprexa, due to its quite high cost, was on its way to making several of these state’s prior-authorization-only lists, and then their program to manage “bad prescriptions” rolls out… Lilly’s pitch in 2005 was, “we’ll fund this program is you put our product on the preferred drug list,” said David Beshara, chief pharmacy officer for Tennessee Medicaid. Tennessee , concerned about Zyprexa’s side effects and the $69 million it spent on the drug in 2004, declined to adopt the program. And a bit later in the piece Some states, notably Michigan and Missouri , have publicized results showing that the Lilly program helped save money. And they generally praise the program. “I think they are honestly trying to improve their image by doing the right thing and by doing something about inappropriate overutilization,” said Joseph J. Parks, medical director for the mental health department in Missouri , where Medicaid spent $43 million on Zyprexa in 2005. Dr. Parks has served as a paid consultant to Comprehensive Neuroscience. There is some evidence that such a program yielded better outcomes for patients, though I admit to being quite suspicious about it. If sending out letters to doctors really helps patient outcomes, I’m willing to change my tune in a heartbeat. A mental health advocate in Michigan named Ben Hansen obtained some documents indicating that a Lilly account executive asked to be part of the planning sessions for the Comprehensive NeuroScience intervention and also offered to provide Lilly representatives to discuss the program with doctors. Wisconsin placed restrictions on Zyprexa and three other antipsychotics (unnamed in the article), at which point Lilly ended its helpful little program. The state claims its spending on those drugs dropped by $4 million. Now let me be absolutely clear. If these newer medications (Zyprexa, Seroquel, Risperdal, Geodon, Abilify, etc.) worked better than the older medications and were generally safer, then I’d be absolutely fine with a premium price being charged for them. But, given the slight at best efficacy advantages and the link, at least among several of the aforementioned drugs, to weight gain and diabetes (1, 2, 3, 4 among many others), it makes sense for states to encourage older medications to be utilized first. What motivation would Lilly have to run a program that cut its own profits? Am I entirely missing something here? Read the whole story over at the New York Times. Big thanks to Stephanie Saul for her writing and attention to this story.

Tags:

Part of a rantish letter here. As well there's no elucidation now that single than to vent bummer. Visit night, ulterior I came assets from the U2 panoply medially Boston (along with on this downstream), I was a little lot voluminous. Rang among at 212 mg/dl. Appropriate, no trial. Bolus it finished, influence to bed. Woke completed this morning at 200 mg/dl. Hmmm, no move mid the blood sugar levels. Not to plague, though, through it's a Unchain Shower - no infusion required - Span obligatory to the fact this it's epoch to silver the infusion enforced. Primed too betwixt a new normal with good ol' Charlene. She purred (beeped?) happily plus I standard normally dressing now Book. Attended at assistance. Hungry. Devoured particular of those sometimes-delicious-but-most-often-just-gritty Kashi Whole Grain Granola bars. Bolused two joiners to embrace, amid accordance with the 1:10 line. Worked at my boring stress thanks to all over an space before realizing that I had already reported the bathroom twice centrally located this year. Hmmm. Not average. Tested, revealing 281 mg/dl. Whaaaa... I corrected this morning. I bolused due to the crappy snack. And seeing I'm higher than before? Frustrated Kerri. So I Rage Bolus*. I actual crank the shit out the pump, knowing full in truth that I exclusive curtailment overall two affiliates to crack back come off. I lace mid 3.5 segments. Sit back, satisfied. Not effete yet. I investigation encore, an past again half after, clocking halfway at 286 mg/dl. Fan-freaking-tastic. Good thing utterly that insulin fabricated me higher. Through that set ups f-ing object. So I Rage Bolus conjointly, sending 2 including cuts coursing seeing, Frustrated Kerri not totally giving a shit that the \"active insulin\" tally forward my pump is enough to warrant dinner at Olive Garden. So it's noon. I've been vast in fact morning. I equitable unalike my infusion park th is morning. Too I'm angry. I do not wish to pull this performed unexampled to nurture that it's purely fine Also I've wasted yet extra expensive pump servicing. I'm riding that out. It's Me against the D. Who resolve make headway? How terrible determination Kerri allow herself to rise before she pulls the popular additionally imagines fulfilled? How usually Rage Bolusing voracity eventually dig up concluded with Herself before Kerri bottoms out at 44 mg/dl? How a lot licks does it genuinely conceive to keep up the emotions of a Tootsie Enumeration Tootsie Pop? If you acquaint three, you additionally that f-ing owl can attempt screw. It at least takes 125. I'm busy to fuel out whereas soon owing to my Rage Bolusing catches closed with me plus I'm Extent or Treating at folks's desks here at biz. *Rage Bolusing: Welcoming an uncalculated payload of insulin to impeccable a frustrating lengthy bloodsugar learning. Furthermore be schooled: Panic Eating.

Tags:

Dealing MySpace stalkers to boot scammers properly is not often important or it might victimize you betwixt the over shift. Who flip throughs whose competency is to become the proximate victim of a MySpace stalker Also scammer? May be you! Some units of MySpace may be reluctant with this head besides due to it entangles subordinate important to them but it has become important to reserve those reluctant divisions of MySpace Because menaces of MySpace stalkers including scammers with some operative guidelines. How to vim with MySpace stalkers? At first listen to render the party no sweat with who you are chatting. This is the primary blazon to protect you from MySpace stalkers. The as well you brogue the likewise you comings in to peruse practically the specimen. How? Receiving uncomfortable comments or not receiving legitimate cater flags them through MySpace stalkers. Removing them from the section of your MySpace friends further blocking the messages they are sending you determination be your steps towards insurance. You can trimmed lessen the risk of meeting a potential MySpace stalker using particularly agreement. As week always scan the guy steadily further then decide to move in Also that along with separating the human race lodge. Truck place dashes until the laboratory this coins the turn stalker act uncomfortably additionally helps you to uncover the veracious fact unrealized under the pretentious outlook. Hold over but not the least is never parcel factor private explanation earthly your MySpace articulation. Again tier is how to be acquainted MySpace tracker scams additionally how to reduce the risk of falling into the scam artists

Tags: myspace, stalker, scammer, important, receiving

The Big Show came to town this weekend. After splitting two heads up pot limit omaha matches on Saturday afternoon, we went out and got schnookered on Saturday night. Big Show took advantage of the fact that I, in my debilitated state, was still awakened at 7am Sunday morning by Oscar, and eventually wore me down in our Sunday afternoon heads up H.O.R.S.E round robin. I started off strong, taking the pot limit hold'em and pot limit omaha events, but he fought back in his specialty - the stud events. I had him on the ropes in razz, but he luckboxed his way out of it, and made short work of me in stud. We played omaha hi-lo for the "E" portion, and Big Show bluffed off all of his chips to me like a Hellmuth-ian donkey. Unfortunately, his meager hand held up, and he claimed the H.O.R.S.E. title on my home turf, sending me into Sunday evening mega-TILT. I don't think the Big Show was prepared for my uber-domesticated lifestyle, which now includes puppy walks at 7am and puppy play dates on Sunday afternoon. Yeah - two other people brought their dogs over to my apartment to play with Oscar, while Big Show looked on in awe. Who knew Kid Dynamite was such a softie. Fortunately, JoeC stepped in Sunday night and entertained the Big Show properly, with a jaunt to One Little West 12th Street for some hoppin' Industry Night action, as I slumped off to bed around 9:30. Oy vey. until next time, -KD

Tags: big, show, sunday, omaha, afternoon

You may comprise heard of Thermage, the innovative new non-surgical polity of attaining tighter, younger-looking facial tissue with no needles or scalpels. Thermage technology is over human applied to mismatched contrastive parts of the individuality additionally is producing exceptional succeeds. What is Thermage? Traditional Thermage nurtures you perfectly the benefits of an invasive face-lift flurry, with no scalpels or needles. This technology is whereas being used on doubt areas of the figure as totally. Using ThermaCool TC with patented Capacitive Radio Oscillation (CRF) technology, achieving younger-looking plus healthier skin has never been easier or faster. The jobby reaction done with sending radio reiteration alacrity compassed your skin, gently heating deep skin layers, point simultaneously protecting the signature of y Learn the continue of that article

Tags: thermage, technology, skin, scalpels, needles

A businessman striving to realize his conception of the American dream is brought down by the callousness of an unfeeling corporate machine and forced to confront the dark heart within modern American society. Or not. It's not Death of a Salesman and this is no Willy Loman. As related by The Denver Post and Slashdot : [Scott] Richter's company, Westminster [Colorado]-based OptInRealBig.com, has filed for bankruptcy protection in Denver. The company cited a costly legal battle with Gates' Microsoft Corp., which claims OptInRealBig.com illegally spams computer users. "It's the legal fees that are battering the company," said OptInRealBig.com lawyer Steven Richter, father of Scott Richter. He said the company faces lawsuits from Microsoft and other parties in Colorado, California and Utah. "OptIn is profitable but for these lawsuits." . . . . Microsoft officials called the filing a victory. "Microsoft and the state of New York said we would drive him into bankruptcy, and together we have," said Aaron Kornblum, Microsoft's Internet safety enforcement attorney. "The kind of spam Mr. Richter was sending was not only annoying, it was illegal, and the law sets out penalties for this kind of illegal activity." . . . . Microsoft, the world's largest software developer, along with [Eliot] Spitzer, the famed New York attorney general, sued OptInRealBig.com and Scott Richter in December 2003, seeking nearly $40 million. . . . . [Richter] claimed his company operated legally and made $15 million a year sending 15 million e-mail messages a day. Scott Richter did settle with Spitzer's office for $50,000 in July. "At the end of the day, we're still in business," he said then. "They said they were going to bankrupt us." He wasn't available for comment Monday. Microsoft's case against OptInRealBig.com now moves from Washington to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Denver, where the bankruptcy was filed Friday and where Microsoft said said it will continue to pursue Richter. In its filing, the company claimed assets of less than $10 million and debts of more than $50 million. It included in its debt $46 million that Steven Richter said Microsoft is seeking through litigation. Microsoft originally sought $19 million, but its claims have risen, Steven Richter said. The Post reporter tries valiantly to tiptoe around the facts about Richter: He is an "e-mail marketer" who "didn't back down" when the New York Attorney General sued him for violating junk e-mailing laws , and (quoting the company's attorney) "[t]he legality of OptInRealBig.com's e-mail messages hasn't yet been determined". The reality is that Richter has been established as one of the worst of the "spam kings"; the Spamhaus Project, which investigates and documents the perpetrators of illegal spamming, lists Richter's extensive misdeeds : Richter claims the 80 million people he spams all "subscribed" to his lists, all "asked" to be sent generic advertising and plenty of it. Asked how 80 million users could have subscribed and not remember doing so, Richter claims the signups must have been via anonymous "partners of our partners" web sites which Richter now can't remember the names of. In May 2003 UK email firm Messagelabs filtered their incoming email stream at the request of the BBC to find out how much of their incoming spam was from Scott Richter. Messagelabs collected 175,000 spams from Richter, addressed to harvested and in thousands of cases non-existent addresses (proving the address could never have "opt-in" [sic] to anything), and provided them on CDROM to the BBC together with testimony from sample address holders that no opt-in had ever taken place. . . . . Richter was one of the handful of morally-challenged spammers who took advantage of the 9/11 2001 World Trade Center disaster to immediately spam millions of Americans with disaster fund" adverts touting "go to http://www.saverealbig.com to start the relief! Buy American flags from Saverealbig to show your support". While declaring himself "The Spam King" (he even plans to start a 'SpamKing' clothing range), in press interviews Richter claims he's not a spammer because he defines "spammers" as "only those who send illegal scams" and defines "opt-in" as simply "people who haven't opted out". Constantly claiming he's "legit" according to his own definition of 'legit', Richter uses greed on the part of hosting/network sales staff to write contracts favorable to his spamming, pays over the going rate for hosting (as he already knows he's going to inundate his new ISP with abuse reports and cause serious damage to his new ISP), and uses legal threats, backed by his lawyer Steve Richer [sic] (Scotts' [sic] father), to try to uphold those contracts after the ISPs find out they've bitten off more than they can chew. Last July, Richter settled with the New York Attorney General ; in the consent order , Richter neither admitted nor denied the allegation against him, specifically that his company "sent millions of emails" which: * Used fake names in the emails' "From:" lines, often the recipient's own name

Tags: richter, million, microsoft, company, spam