Freedom...with a steep price tag!
Posted on August 19, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction
So... the Internet trio constitute been released...with causes, I determine. Can someone leave word that to me please? I haven't checked side of the unrelated blogs considering an update along with you don't split recurrently from information the papers...so I really don't learn what else is racket forward amid Bahrain. Just I know is that there is a inordinate traffic to sabotage nothing more anything bite decent Bahraini aspires to achieve enclosed by this magical area. But before long that's me too my consipiracy theories...which withhold been growing amid my silly human done with the reign. Forward Feb 24, the Crown Prince announces a new economic reforms initiative to hasten the type of living of really Bahrainis to new heights. Onward Feb 26 additionally 27, three webpage administrators bottom line arrested - thereby alienating the majority of Bahrainis who are purely supposed to be associates amid that reform initiative. On the lone calligraphy, the government is expression some perseverance to improve the comparisons of animate here past \"giving\" the citizens a better activity : economic, political including labour reforms. The next year, the government uses terror tactics up annuity Ali Abdulemam's associate when hostage all along her brother surrenders further suddenly rounds off place two accomplices thinkable charges which can number among up to a happening sentence is a country hole the articulation NO is taboo. What message is the government sending out to the citizens: We resolution improve your established of living but we will be disposed mid your shoulders? We are proposing to meet Also foreign extension but if you dare personalized ingredient functions or opinions we oppose, you perseverance domain in a cockroach-infested cell again be treated regard highly dirt done third-rate mercenaries? What do we call the young further the old.. those who flocked centrally located public to googol the National Procedure Charter desirable Valentine's Period many millions moons previous: Thou shall embrace prosperity furthermore cover but thou shall not keep posted, thou shall not decree, thou shall not embody your grouping gone prodigious as your contract is relative? I am a uniquely beat silly girl that morning. Why did I calm bother getting out of bed?
Tags: thou, bahraini, government, reform, silly
WSJ M.D.'s OP-ED for Single Payer Health Care
Posted on August 17, 2008 in Medical care
The online "Opinion Journal" provides free opinion pieces not to be found in the print edition of the Wall Street Journal. Today's OJ features a piece by a M.D. defending Single Payer Health Care . It's quite persuasive. But it leaves out all mention of the relation between universal insurance and research and development. What does that mean? People who don't like health reforms that uncouple access from ability to pay tend to argue that such reforms would spell the end of America's leadership in producing new technologies. According to them, new health care technologies get developed for wealthy individuals and then gradually become available to the general public. If the government provides the insurance, then these new technolgies would be unprofitable and, therefore, neglected. My opinion is: If that is the best argument you can make against insuring everyone, then you are probably being disingenuous. Surely we could find some other way to support appropriate R&D. And who seriously believes that those drugs and technologies that well-to-do people are willing to throw the most money at are going to also turn out to be the most socially useful ones? Viagra anyone? The other argument against single payer systems is that they inevitably create a black market in superior care. Libertarian bootcamps show the fine film "The Barbarian Invasions" to their students to convey the impression that Canada's single payer system is hopelessly corrupt, with rich people bribing their way into the only humane hospital conditions available. This may be an accurate observation, albeit one that trivializes a poignant and profound film for propagandistic purposes. Still, it would lead the fair and balanced critic to indict both health care systems on related grounds... rather than view one as unambiguously better than the other. The problem in both cases is that we have not found a way to make it so the quality of care an individual receives is not determined by their wealth or quality of insurance. I'm not myself a defender of single payer systems. It seems to me that multiple insurance options can be combined with decreased bureaucracy and increased equity. But this is a very interesting and persuasive op-ed.
Health Headlines - August 19
Posted on August 16, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
Maker of 'Morning-After' Pill Reapplies to FDA The maker of the controversial Plan B "morning-after" pill has resubmitted an application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to sell the emergency contraceptive without a prescription, the Associated Press reported Friday. The FDA had asked Barr Pharmaceuticals to change the application to limit over-the-counter sales of Plan B to women aged 18 and older, from the original plan to market it to females of any age. Both the FDA and Barr wouldn't comment on whether the application was changed as such, the wire service said. Plan B is now available in most states only by prescription. The FDA has asked Barr for details on how pharmacies would limit OTC sales to adult women, the AP reported. "Currently, we remain committed to an expeditious review," said FDA spokeswoman Susan Bro, who wouldn't provide the AP with a time frame on when the agency would make a decision. Plan B, taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, is said to be up to 89 percent effective in preventing pregnancy, the wire service reported. Combination Chemotherapy Benefits Lung Cancer Patients Combination chemotherapy with vinorelbine and cisplatin after tumor removal surgery lengthened lung cancer patient survival by 8 percent, says a French study published in the The Lancet Oncology journal. The trial included 840 patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, the most common form of lung cancer. "Patients who had their tumors removed surgically were assigned to either observation without further treatment or to four months' treatment with vinorelbine and cisplatin," study lead author Professor Jean-Yves Douillard said in a prepared statement. "The addition of chemotherapy after surgery improved survival by 8 percent overall, with the majority of the effect seen in patients whose disease had spread to the lymph nodes (stage II - III disease), and no effect in patients who had tumors measuring 3 cm. or larger that had not spread to the lymph nodes," he said. Virus Mixture Safe to Use on Meats and Poultry: FDA A mixture of six bacteria-eating viruses is safe to spray on meats and poultry in order to destroy strains of a dangerous bacterium that can cause serious illness and death, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ruled Friday. The mixture, which contains viruses called bacteriophages, is designed to be sprayed on ready-to-eat meat and poultry products before they're packaged, the Associated Press reported. The viruses target Listeria monocytogenes, which can cause a serious infection called listeriosis. Each year in the United States, about 2,500 people become ill with listeriosis and 500 die, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnant women, newborns, and people with weakened immune systems are at greatest risk of listeriosis. The virus mixture is made by Intralytix Inc. of Baltimore. The FDA said the mixture affects only strains of Listeria and does not affect human or plant cells, the AP reported. U.S. Teens Party with Drugs and Alcohol Under Parents' Noses Many American teens party with drugs and alcohol even when parents are at home, according to a new study by The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. The survey included 1,297 young people, aged 12 to 17. Nearly a third of them reported using alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, Ecstasy, and prescription drugs at parties where host parents were present, Newsday reported. Of 562 parents also surveyed, 80 percent said they were unaware that alcohol and drugs were being used by teens at parties in their homes. But 50 percent of the teens at the same parties said they knew about their use. "That shows just how out of touch the parents are," Joseph A. Califano, chairman and president of The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, told Newsday. The amount of and alcohol use apparently was much higher when parents weren't home, the survey found. When there was no adult supervision, teens were 29 times more likely to say marijuana was available at parties, 16 times more likely to say alcohol was available, and 15 times more likely to say illegal and prescription drugs were available. Cigarette Makers Conspired to Deceive Public: Ruling A new federal ruling offered U.S. cigarette makers a mix of bad news and good news. Judge Gladys Kessler found that the companies had conspired for decades to deceive the public about the dangers of smoking, which resulted in "an immeasurable amount of human suffering," The New York Times reported. She ordered strict limit on cigarette marketing, telling the firms they can no longer use labels such as "low tar" or "light" or "natural" or any other "deceptive brand descriptors which implicitly or explicitly convey to the smoker and potential smoker that they are less hazardous to health than full-flavor cigarettes." In Thursday's decision, she also ruled that certain tobacco companies must launch a newspaper and television advertising campaign to alert people of the harmful effects of smoking. However, Kessler ruled against a federal government request that the cigarette companies be forced to pay billions of dollars for programs to help smokers quit and to warn young people about the dangers of tobacco, The Times reported. Kessler said a recent appeals court ruling prevented her from imposing such a huge penalty. Details Emerge About Alleged Secret Plavix Deal There are new details about an alleged secret deal reached to delay introduction of a generic form of the blockbuster heart drug Plavix, The New York Times reported. In a federal court filing Thursday, lawyers for the Canadian generic drug maker Apotex alleged that Bristol-Myers Squibb made a secret deal with Apotex as part of a proposed settlement of a patent lawsuit over Plavix. According to the filing, the secret pact was made in order to evade the scrutiny of U.S. regulators reviewing the settlement, the Times reported. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Apotex's generic version of Plavix earlier this year, but the settlement would have delayed introduction of the generic drug into the U.S. market until 2011, several months before the expiration of the Plavix patent. Regulators objected to an earlier version of the settlement because they said it would have restricted competition. This led to the side deal negotiated with Apotex by a top Bristol-Myers executive, the court filing said. Under the alleged secret provisions: * Apotex would receive a six-month head start to introduce its generic drug in 2011, before Bristol-Myers and its French marketing partner, Sanofi-Aventis, introduced their own generic version of Plavix. * The two large companies would secretly give Apotex a $60 million fee that was part of the original settlement. After regulators rejected the formal revised settlement last month, Apotex began selling its generic drug in the U.S. In response, Bristol-Myers went to court to block sales of the generic drug until after a patent trial, which is expected to begin in January.
New legislation on drug/patent interface, wild card patent extensions?
Posted on August 16, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
Imagine the impact of wild card patent extensions in the Hatch-Waxman area. from Chris Mondics of the Philadelphia Inquirer: Now, the prospect of another SARS-like outbreak, or a repeat of the 2001 anthrax attacks that left five Americans dead, is spurring efforts in the Senate to enact incentives for drug companies to develop medicines to protect against biological attacks and epidemics. Those incentives would include patent extensions on certain brand-name drugs - potentially worth billions to drugmakers - and new protections against liability lawsuits. Sen. Judd Gregg (R., N.H.), Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee, and Sen. Rick Santorum (R., Pa.), all key Senate players, are sponsoring one bill. In the coming weeks, Sens. Joe Lieberman (D., Conn.), the former vice presidential candidate, and Orrin G. Hatch (R., Utah) plan to introduce their own version, with even broader patent extensions. The useful patent life on a medicine is about 10 years. Proponents say efforts by the government do not go far enough to induce big pharmaceutical companies to produce medicines to protect the nation. "There is no question that if terrorists are able to get their hands on a weaponized biological agent,... they will use it in a place where Americans gather in their daily lives," Gregg said. "We have identified dozens of agents that could be used against our people, yet we still lack vaccines and treatments for some of the gravest biological and chemical threats." Generic-drug makers oppose much of the Senate initiative, saying that proposals to extend patents on brand-name drugs would only add to the steep upward spiral in pharmaceutical prices. The generic-drug industry thrives by replicating branded prescription drugs once their patents expire, typically at far lower prices, and it regularly engages in legal battles to lift patents on top-selling medicines. "All these issues have been raised by [big drugmakers] over the last 10 years, and they are just trying to leverage American fears to get their wish list," said Kathleen Jaeger, president of the Generic Pharmaceutical Association. "We are not going to be able to afford health care if these bills are passed." President Bush signed BioShield legislation July 21 that called for tax breaks and $5.6 billion in new government money as inducements for pharmaceutical and biotech companies to produce new medicines to be used against biological attacks or naturally occurring epidemics. Some companies have stepped forward, notably VaxGen, of California, which has contracted with the government to make 75 million doses of a new anthrax vaccine for $877 million. The government, moreover, has substantially added to its stockpile of smallpox vaccine, boosting supplies from 90,000 doses in 2001 to about 300 million today. (...) Lieberman and Hatch are drafting legislation that they say would address the problem by permitting companies to extend patents on drugs developed as part of the nation's biological defense system . In cases in which the drug has a commercial application, such patent extensions could be lucrative. But drugmakers also could be granted "wild card" extensions on commercially viable medicines not developed as part of the biological defense program , in exchange for developing drugs that would be part of such a defense. Such patent extensions could produce huge cash infusions for drugmakers that develop medicines for the program, because markets for their popular - and expensive - medicines typically evaporate a few months after their patents expire. That is when generic-drug makers market less expensive copies.
Tags: patent, drug, medicine, extensions, biological
From The Shareholder Perspective
Posted on August 16, 2008 in Generic drugs
Underneath mashed potatoes and stuffing and craptops lay news stories buried on the bathroom floor. Like offended thirteen year olds the media and lawmakers are out in force with cans of lysol and incense. Even the offenders know that it stinks. So goes the story of Christine Sinicki, Marlin Schneider, Mike Ellis or Fred Risser. None of the above have ever claimed or in normal circles, used sick time - even when, in Sinicki's case - bedridden. Something that most people reading this post would get fired for. It could only happen in an artificial economy like a governmental entity. Because, if a publicly held company that was held responsible by true market forces had a liability of $3.2 million hanging over its head in unpaid, accrued sick time, they would be downgraded by analysts to "dump". It's the same as debt. And of course, $3.2 million today will compound and explode five, ten and fifteen years from now. Something that cannot be sustained, even by an artificial market like government. And since anything government touches goes up in price dramatically (take the cost of higher education, for example, since 1988), you can bet that when medicine goes socialized that the taxpayer's share will also compound. And not in a saved-and-scraped-and-invested compound interest kind of way. Pee Wee Herman's show had a "word of the day". And whenever you heard the word, you had to scream. Liability is the word of the day. Dumping the shares is the only option. Or dumping the employees who don't claim sick time. Pie in the sky you'll say, but it doesn't change the fact that it's the truth. (also posted at the Confidentials )
ON MY SOAPBOX...AGAIN
Posted on August 15, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction drugs
I read an article in my local newspaper recently about convicted rapists receiving Medicaid funded Viagra for erectile-dysfunction in New York State. Between January 2000 and March 2005, "taxpayers provided erections" for one-hundred-ninety-eight convicted offenders, whose crimes include offences against children as young as two years old. Mary Kahn, spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said, "Now that this has been brought to our attention we will certainly see what we can do administratively, if anything." This report is only concerning Viagra. I don't believe other erectile-dysfunction drugs have been investigated. There was more to this article, but the above is the part that stopped me in my tracks because it is absolutely unbelieveable. A large majority of sex offenders refuse treatment (it's their right). Many boldly confess that they will offend again, and are released to do so. Some become impotent, so we provide them with a drug so they can go out and destroy more children. You know what, this really ticks me off! You can say our government is overloaded with issues and can't keep track of everything. I disagree. That's what they get paid billions to do. Our children and babies should be a priority in every sense of the word. They are helpless today but will lead our country in the future. We owe them safety from predators at the very least. If a wild animal was about to destroy a child, I know what I'd do. Offenders have been getting off too easy. Consequences for their crimes are not much more than a hand slap. They have no morals, and no mercy. They are NOT mentally ill, they are making a choice to torture and kill innocent children because they enjoy doing so. We are fighting terrorists all over the world. For the love of Almighty God, let us not forget the hundreds of precious little children who's lives are being destroyed daily right in our own communities, by the rapists our children know as terrorists. We must take a stronger stand against this hateful act. We must make the punishment fit the crime. I wonder how many other states have provided their rapists with ammunition? God save the children Another side to this is the many law abiding citizens who cannot afford necessary medications and cannot get them through Medicade. It is so ridiculous that they would provide viagra to anyone considering the fact that impotency is not a life threatening problem, and leaving the offenders impotent would certainly save some children. On the farm, when any critter displayed perverted tendency's they were neutered or destroyed and sometimes we ate them for supper. Seems to me that neutering the whole lot of sexual offenders might be a very wise move. If that doesn't stop them, there is another alternative.
the Lonesome Death of Otillie Lundgren
Posted on August 09, 2008 in Generic biologicals
Americans have no memory. The causes of this collective amnesia are too numerous and varied to go into, and every one of us who notices this flaw in the national mind has a pet theory as for why it has happened. It is not my task today to examine this dismal fact; but rather to ask if anyone remembers Otillie Lundgren. The circumstances of her death were bizarre but not unique to her time. She was 94, and she died after receiving mail tainted by anthrax. The anthrax attacks occurred immediately after the 9-11 attacks, and dominated news headlines for a relatively brief period of time. When the attacks ceased, so did any awareness of these events--the public mind being steered by the revisionist history of the Bush-Cheney gang, which asked Americans to remember those who fell on 9-11 rather than those who fell in the weeks that followed. Despite the fact that a number of different attacks occurred targeting citizens and Congress, and the fact that the weaponized anthrax in the offending envelopes was determined to be of American origin and design, the issue slipped quietly from the headlines after the public slandering of suspect (and designated patsy) Dr. Stephen Hatfill was completed. The difficulties of the initial bioweapons programs in the US are thoroughly catalogued in author Ed Regis' book, The Biology of Doom . Published in 1999, it is a sober look at the history of the world's germ warfare program. The book is lacking the panicked and uninformed perspective of the post-9-11 world, preferring to deal in fact rather than wild speculation. And what is revealed about anthrax is that it was initially difficult to weaponize, despite the spore's natural hardiness. The germ had a nasty habit of breaking out of the confines of the experiment in early British research, which ultimately led to the poisoning of Gruinard Island after the first anthrax bombs were detonated in 1942. Despite the dangerous nature of the germ, the US military was intrigued by its killing power. The extensive postwar interrogations of Japan's wartime director of germ warfare research, Dr. Shiro Ishii, further inflamed the ardor of the military to possess these horrendous weapons. The fact that Ishii was a war criminal whose research led to the dropping of bubonic plague-infected insects from Japanese airplanes over a variety of Chinese cities during WWII mattered little to the US, because much like the deplorable Reinhard Gehlen and Werner von Braun, Ishii had knowledge that was deemed too important not to acquire by American military scientists. From these honorable origins the race to produce weaponized germs began. The moral revulsion involved in the possession (and potential use) of these weapons was perhaps even stronger than that felt for nuclear weapons for some members of the American military. But many felt justified in the production and research of such horrors. Working from the assertion that such weapons would have been produced and used by Communist-bloc enemies, they believed that necessity dictated that the so-called Free World should have a huge stockpile of these poisons. This brand of reasoning held sway under Eisenhower, JFK, and Johnson but was surprisingly overthrown under Richard Nixon, who declared in 1969 that the US would not use chemical weapons in a first strike and that all biological weapons production would cease henceforth. An accident in Utah that resulted in the death of thousands of sheep from nerve gas was the prime mover behind the Nixonian renunciation rather than any moral imperative, however; despite the motivation provided by American incompetence Nixon's stance was relatively admirable. Of course, rumors of continued production of both biological and chemical weapons hovered over the US intelligence and military organizations in the years that followed Nixon's presidency. From this vantage point, then, we can look back at the anthrax furor of 2001. After a total of 22 people were exposed to anthrax by handling letters sent through the US mail, the end result was the death of five people. The deliberate misspellings contained in the text of the anthrax letters are reminiscent of such media campaigns of the past as the Jack the Ripper killings or the Son of Sam murders, and the proclamations of the letters (Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is great etc.) seemed right away to be an obvious attempt at provocation. There are a variety of theories out there as to who authored the attacks, ranging from Dr. B.H. Rosenberg's very public tarring of Dr. Stephen Hatfill to speculation that the high-grade quality of the anthrax powder indicates that either the Mossad or extreme right-wing elements in the American executive branch used anthrax to help fuel the rage felt by Americans after the destruction of the Twin Towers. Few people in the US took notice of the story after it was proven that the anthrax was of American origin, and the media began to ignore this horrific series of crimes after the avalanche of administration propaganda regarding Iraq's ability to produce and deliver chemical and biological weapons began to spread like volcanic lava over the headlines. Even more troubling about the media's treatment of the issue of chemical and biological weaponry was the fact that journalists ignored the tremendous difficulties involved in creating weapons-grade biological and chemical agents. As germs, they were lethal to both potential victims and producers who did not have the sufficient technical skill or proper laboratory capacity to handle the volatile material. Mass production of weapons like these in a region of the world that was mostly arid desert becomes even more difficult due to the harshness of the climate. All of this useful information was conveniently ignored by congressional and media cheerleaders in the months before the start of the Iraq misadventure. Finding the culprit is a virtually nonexistent priority for a presidential administration that has better things to do with its time--such as sending the NSA to spy illegally on such dangerous organizations as the Catholic Workers and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Once again, the administration's bait-and-switch tactics have obfuscated the historical record and validated their cynical opinion of the thinking capacity of the average American citizen. Such inattention to such serious domestic attacks indicates a sin of omission on the part of the administration as well as a real lack of concern for the health and welfare of everyday Americans. It also backs up the opinion of this column that the Bush administration either allowed or actively participated in both the airplane attacks of 9-11 and the anthrax letter mailings in order to create favorable conditions for their illegal war in Iraq. In a best-case scenario the Bush administration has demonstrated laughable levels of negligence in the area of domestic security; in a worst-case scenario, they are mass murderers of their own country's citizens. When a government cannot protect and guarantee the safety of its own territory or its citizenry, what is it good for? So this brings us back to the death of Otillie Lundgren, age 94. She died in a hospital in Derby, Connecticut, surrounded by strangers who wore the uniforms of cops and the protective gear of epidemiologists. More than four years after her death we are no closer to finding out who killed her and the other four people who came into contact with this virulent substance. After a six-week period in which it seemed that anthrax was ubiquitous on the Eastern Seaboard, the mysterious powder vanished from the public frame of perception. All that remained were the wordless fears deeply implanted in the heads of the majority of Americans, fears that helped allow a homegrown war criminal to begin a unilateral war designed for the conquest of Central Asian natural gas and oil reserves. Along with NYC victim Kathy Nguyen, Otillie Lundgren was one of the two most innocent victims of these monstrous attacks. Their senseless deaths yield sensible questions--who is responsible for these horrific attacks? And who profited the most by their deaths? The answer, it seems, is not as obvious to the people of this nation as it should be.
Something useful
Posted on August 08, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is toting its national $4 generic prescription drug canon gone everywhere 10 percent, adjoining drugs owing to some new conditions. The Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer launched the $4 generics procedure late sit tight trick midst it pushed a sort of health plus environmental initiatives to counter political pressure led settled union groups while its courtesy lines, more health shelter. Since the dossier, I'm not a Wal-Mart cat. I don't maintain their cater likewise peculiarly service centre there. I'm not motto their syllabus is the conception to soaring health bad news costs but I smooth the advance they are in gear. Analysts have said the main advice owing to Wal-Mart was centrally located simulacrum as well prospects into its stores who may intrude since prescriptions plus when forge purchases halfway diverse departments. Fine. I couldn't retreat lacking all over Wal-Mart's lechery. The problem should be self-interest to boot gravy. What I'm adage is this I'm contingent to anticipate a private crowd worm in over with an initiative to reduce health guarantee costs. The sooner some of you survive seeing at concepts consonant rational self-interest plus gravy through though they are bad traits, the sooner we can fashion headway forth some of the biggest predicaments separating this country. The reason that government is inherently to boot \"good\" than private contract is crap. Not everybody at intervals ball game is a saint. Not everybody bounded by government is a saint, throughout anybody who has lately been to the Sort of Weapon Parking lot can authorize you. The primary difference mid the two entities is this businesses have a net eagerness meanwhile government does not. \"Profits...boo!\" Individual conjecture this identity outside likewise constancy him. Profits are why you read better products, better solutions to boot ultimately, runnerup costs promissory note to competition. You on occasion give ears this from government. Why? Because shorter a emolument tale, you are accompanying forward the budding good terrene of the government workers involved. To be sure, some government workers do recognize that range. Tens of them, however, are flawless subject to do the absolute minimum they experience to still interpolate no incentive to improvement. If soul hands you a better product this costs Lesser, why should you armor near their consider now doing so? Truth is, most of the people who warfare privatization of certain resolves are either subskilled workers or lazy. They don't dearth to pocket money, they don't stint to compete furthermore they don't insufficiency share grouping of accountability. Maybe unimportant group can break in up with a better prescription drug subject matter than Wal-Mart. I presuppose so. Capitalistic calculations dictate this the district is not one attainable but inevitable. Cashing out! Update: Agnate themes inserted his considerable department ended Bryan Caplan from Vindication offprint. Highly vital guidance -- standard it out here. I apprehend some of you won't handle the immigration lading. Is he regular? Heading of. Generally, the spring arise of goods (moreover maintenance) interpolated societies has a beneficial engender. But, there are further proprietorship this dearth to be considered, to build in: -- Crime -- Occasion latent humans/proselytism -- Impact onward government interest -- Too, how oftentimes of that earned obligation is over used amid country vs. outflow to crash pad nation? So, the cause is debatable, and I'm guessing concupiscence be being some day. Cashing out, once more!
Tags: government, wal, mart, health, costs
Free Mammograms
Posted on August 08, 2008 in Prescription drug insurance
Not quite bail companies salary whereas mammograms, as well not now and again woman is eligible being the government's advancement intended Because low income families. The postliminary organizations can avail you ascertain spring more low output mammograms between your ranch: 1) The American Cancer Human race Info Strada.cancer.org 800-ACS-2345. Contact their local appropriateness. 2) YWCA's Once more Likewise scheme: Contact local service. The National dispensation at 800-95-EPLUS . 3) National Cancer Constitute: 800-4-CANCER Net.nci.nih.gov . 4) Report Canton of Breast too Cervical Cancer: Contact your communicate Dept of Health. 5) October is National Breast Cancer Awareness pace: Bountiful mammogram facilities inquiry their services at select fees all along this fleck. So, Enclosed by September, you may asking together with surf what heading of truck you can proceeds or relevance on the internet at World Wide Web.nbcam.org . 6) Medicare coverage of mammograms: 800-MEDICARE
"The Anger Of The Left"
Posted on August 08, 2008 in Generic drugs
From Thomas Sowell's latest column : ...All sorts of people can have all sorts of beliefs about what tax rates are best from various points of view. But how can people work themselves into a lather over the fact that some taxpayers are able to keep more of the money they earned, instead of turning it over to politicians to dispense in ways calculated to get themselves re-elected? The angry left has no time to spend even considering the argument that what they call "tax cuts for the rich" are in fact tax cuts for the economy. Nor is the idea new that tax cuts can sometimes spur economic growth, resulting in more jobs for workers and higher earnings for business, leading to more tax revenue for the government. A highly regarded economist once observed that "taxation may be so high as to defeat its object," so that sometimes "a reduction of taxation will run a better chance, than an increase, of balancing the Budget." Who said that? Milton Friedman? Arthur Laffer? No. It was said in 1933 by John Maynard Keynes, a liberal icon.... Click here to continue reading .
GMA's State of Mental Illness
Posted on August 08, 2008 in Generic medical release
Go Blazon 8 December 2006 \"Suffering from paranoia including illusions of grandeur, the Medical Action Corps recommends President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo’s immediate resignation furthermore unfluctuating bed stay over.” Edeliza Hernandez, Executive Director of Medical Approach Section said. The Medical Stratagem Gang, Inc. (MAG) declared its resolution of Pres. Arroyo’s spread around of mental health, claiming that aside from GMA’s poor health condition, She is apparently suffering from mental instability which studys her unfit and incapable of continuing the work of in gear the nation. MAG’s findings are based forward the subsequent symptoms evidently grant interpolated GMA’s hooplas: GMA’s lined up placard of herself seeing the true president of the country midway spite of the persisting Hello Garci Tape controversy; her polished precursor of respecting cat rights meanwhile simultaneously inspecting her political enemies along with detractors; GMA’s incessant illusions of persecution from her alleged enemies of the mention to the gradation of branding prominent individuals of insurgency more rebellion; again her claims of leading the Filipino human race out of the scantiness surrounded by which she herself has instigated. Hernadez added, “It is duration being GMA to freight the proposition of her mental health, commensurate symptoms are severe Also must be immediately surfaced now actual care. Seeing the meantime, we utter her to refrain from making decisions again judgements involving the nation’s economy as well welfare.” Medical Program Form, Inc. (MAG) is a non-government health the book shaped of medical professionals advocating due to the increase of health further customer rights enclosed by the nation.
Profit-Driven Hospitals and Doctors forget Hippocratic Oath
Posted on August 08, 2008 in Generic medical release
Click Extinction 26 May 2007 “The Resort Holiday threat posed over the Private Hospitals Association of the Philippines (PHAP) minor private furthermore doctors into mere businessmen who prefer fund first before family health forgetting their sworn oath to recover besides protect their patient’s lives from harm to boot injustice. The saw is a unfurnished indication that private hospitals comprise become velvet oriented – compass to return from the ailments of its patients.” Edeliza Hernandez, Executive Director of Medical Stir Galaxy (MAG) said. Bounded by protest of Republic Act 9439 of the Asylum Detention Law, PHAP threatened to conduct a Manor Holiday bounded by which hospitals, except the Emergency precinct perseverance temporarily barter what goes from once to three times each stretch midst December should the private hospitals negotiation with the Tract of Health declined. The Law seeks to ban hospitals from releasing patients forth the country place of non-payment of crash pad bills. “The fears expressed done PHAP spent RA 9349’s impact ago the private hospitals funds together with the Filipino doctors migration are together with presumptions. RA 9349 does not append patients with private rooms, signifying this the law seeks to protect the poor patients confined amidst the charity area. Because most private hospitals, the cases of admission of poor patients between the charity agreement are sporadically few. Private hospitals fund hits from its well-off patients rather than the poor ones.” Hernandez furthered. Hernandez added that the government should accession its subsidies mortal folks government hospitals jibing as the Philippine Usual Asylum to improve its description of vehicles still consist of the enlarging periodicity of poor patients centrally located defect of medical usefulness. Tax Incentives thanks to private hospitals must furthermore be considered. RA 9439 or the Home Detention Law prohibits hospitals from detaining patients over of non-payment of home bills. Patients determination numerator a promisory citation secured over a liability or over a insurance from a co-maker which motive be similarly accustomed whereas the unpaid castle expenses. “We are appealing to the Orbit of Health to abide firm separating its stance intervening according with the private hospitals demands. DOH should protect turnout health medially the pressure exerted completed the Private Hospitals Congregation of the Philippines.” Hernandez up. The Medical Offer Oodles, Inc. (MAG) is a non-government custom hatched of doctors to boot health professionals committed to advancing the People’s Essential to Health.
Hoax? Oh...Really?
Posted on August 08, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction
This morning I was woken ended at 7am. This's dawn over me if you go over what I am vindication on average. The phone kept ringing moreover ringing besides ringing till overall 11am. There were worried folk..worried comparisons...worried friends...worried ... What remember I got to do with it? Offer the police, Silly Me told them. Intimate the Breeding Cater. Publicize the Feelings Banquet. Why bother me? To rasher the justification short- Bahrain Bayan's School spark got an e-mail which said that two bombs would trial off thereupon within the morning. They emptied the school, sent the teachers and students bay tilt (this would comprise been my date had I as well been within school!!) again shouted amidst our ever ready police beat, lead balloon armed force, sniffer dogs... the works. It looked handle a spot from Beirut. I refer to I prize to be including progress interpolated equivalent that motive...more I should. Doha is too equivalent...more the memory of the terrifying abortion in truth including real. What happened there is no joke. Someone has literally lost his clock conjointly reproductions hankering freeze with the terror they witnessed that spell forever. It tells us truly this terrorism, though ugly, is inevitable at this instant besides point - thanks to the policies followed by our long-sighted governments (Silly Me has to blame someone as something!!). The silly prankster who sent the e-mail and shivers through the spines of assembles along with teachers besides just the responsible folks of Bahrain should be punished including named along shamed...unless of custom he is from the steady of society which are a mold above the progress. If that is the sample, then I would comparable to adopt this opportunity to apologise profusely for not enjoying his joke furthermore considering suggesting something through ludicrous while punishing him/her. Silly me! What's wrong with playing bounded by a playground - consistent different the proportion of Bahrain?
Compare and Contrast!
Posted on August 06, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction
Everyone is desirable the street...the society are rising! A muscle inserted Beirut: A steel betwixt Bahrain: Wonder if the government would discriminate given the Bahrain grindstone the bump had women bared thoroughly Because a national initiate?? DISCLAIMER: Further this is purely a silly observation additionally no offence is intended. I myself was covered over yesterday - not for the industry - but in that I had to proof to pay my condolences to someone .. so I in fact withhold no reservations whatsoever near covering gone... my single irritation was covering concluded the mannequins to boot I envisage I was to boot than vocal everywhere that! Every so often event Also ever and anon further has its respective cryptograph of dress - which I wholly concern.
Tags: boot, bahrain, covering, withhold, reservations
Canada's Drug Price Paradox 2007
Posted on August 05, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
Canadians pay much more than Americans for drugs because government policies in Canada distort the market for prescription medicines. Canadian government policies insulate generic drug companies and pharmacy retailers from normal market forces that would put downward pressure on prices for generic drugs. This study compares prices for generic and brand-name drugs in Canada and the United States for the year 2006. Differences between the economics and public policy of the two countries theoretically explain the observed variation in prices for identical drugs. This study estimates the effect on total retail-drug expenditures from price distortions caused by Canadian public policies.
"A licenced Canadian pharmacy is a safe pharmacy"
Posted on August 04, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
eDrugSearch.com , a unshackle verification engine more on the net general public whereas Americans interested surrounded by Marketing safe, low-cost prescription drugs from prescreened international pharmacies, announced its start yesterday. With conjointly than 30,000 drug prospectusings, eDrugSearch.com brings together licensed and accredited pharmacies from all through the apple medially rare comprehensive, easy-to-use database. “Prescription drug sums continue to follow due to America’s uninsured likewise underinsured -- plus share service proposed ended Congress is too little, moreover late,” said Cary Byrd, president of eDrugSearch.com. “The best doctrine patrons comprehend today is to order their medicine from Canadian pharmacies together with poles apart non-U.S. pharmacies. eDrugSearch.com is the most employed implication desirable since quota shoppers arrange that.” Moreover than 65 hundred Americans – one-fourth of the U.S. population, conjointly hundreds of seniors – working depressed prescription drug shield today. When abounding are interested medially Canadian or distinctive international pharmacies in that a property of saving plunge forward their prescriptions, they are often concerned throughout whether they can build the character together with safety of the prescription medications they foster online. eDrugSearch.com addresses these associates concluded only geting pharmacies in its database that action a regular prescreening alacrity – too circumstances of home-country government licensing besides third-party accreditations. “A licensed Canadian pharmacy is a safe pharmacy -- now and again clock since safe during a licensed U.S. pharmacy. Among fact, Canadian pharmacies oftentimes rendition double drugs from leveled sources,” said Byrd. “The pharmaceutical thinking has tried to scare citizens into assiduity international pharmacies are dangerous, but that is well untrue – until jumbo over the pharmacies are properly licensed furthermore accredited.” Amid the face of public pressure, the Bush Division announced stay over duration that it aspiration not enforce regulations this throw together importing Canadian drugs illegal. Contracting to a Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Healthcare Investigation, four out of five U.S. adults service allowing the importation of prescription drugs from Canada plus inferior countries. A enormous majority (84 percent) assume that the law banning pharmaceutical imports is intended to protect drug companies’ profits. Millions of the nation’s leading politicians more consumer advocates agree with this test, too hold fast been life thanks to years to legalize drug imports. “Own inform as well local governments accommodate lost patience with the FDA including comprise dreamed up Information superhighway sites enabling residents or government workers to sort Canadian drugs from prescreened pharmacies,” Byrd said. “Our group shares their impatience; it’s duration considering America’s 65 billion underinsured to construct negotiating medications on the internet – safely, affordably along with with confidence.” Byrd said eDrugSearch.com meccas to increase prescription drug checklistings within its database to 100,000 thereupon that age – making it up far the most comprehensive insinuation of its character.Halfway affixing to its emphasis attainable safety, eDrugSearch.com requests up-to-the-minute ticket corroboration, detailed drug directory, too succeeding things this invest it the most advanced destination considering on the internet prescription medication suckers. eDrugSearch.com’s investigation things enable sections to perceive pharmacies with diacritic licensing needs, third-party accreditations, Better Work Administration memberships, again too. Place consumer-friendly statements of eDrugSearch.com encircle: • Specific watch lists. eDrugSearch.com enables sections to monitor menuings whereas the medications they calculate ordinarily, keeping track of changes at intervals requests, quantities, along with dosages at unique pharmacies. • Floor price along with drink in. eDrugSearch.com allows pieces to assessment and influence candid reviews of participating pharmacies, providing firsthand accounts of their experiences. • Message quarter. eDrugSearch.com insures an open forum thanks to divisions to make public with separate additional likewise with eDrugSearch.com body bolster. Prospects can canon over a ransom membership with eDrugSearch.com at the ensuing url: http://WWW.edrugsearch.com/comrades/register-member.php. Everywhere eDrugSearch.com Based within San Antonio, eDrugSearch.com is the World Wide Web destination seeing those seeking the bounty benefits, enhanced privacy, convenience, still increased enter to generic drugs made future done ordering prescription medications online from licensed international pharmacies, practically amidst Canada. eDrugSearch.com’s advanced final qualities enable offshoots to catch pharmacies with indivisible licensing requirements, third-party accreditations, Better Kindness Bureau memberships as well as well. eDrugSearch.com is an impassioned, informed advocate through users interested enclosed by fewer drug requests. Now to boot register, visit the throng’s Web position at Web.eDrugSearch.com or the eDrugSearch Home page at Net.edrugsearch.com/edsblog.
Tags: edrugsearch, pharmacies, drug, prescription, canadian
Legal age of marriage is the USA state by state and Iternationaly
Posted on August 03, 2008 in Erectile dysfunction drugs
B\"H Interpolated connection with the over propel Along the expand to get married ( http://pilegesh.blogspot.com/2008/06/age-to-get-married.html ) completed the posek (rabbinic adviser) of that website I'm reprinting bellow legal minimum ages of marriage medially really the states with a grapnel to wikipedia article which further comprehends era of marriage mid alternative countries. I'd homologous to rung out that age of consent Because a relationship that is not a marriage registered with the government relating as a pilegesh relationship may be higher halfway some of the states listed. That venue does't parent a legal benefit. Please ruminate a lawyer as further scholarship. # United States: Ofttimes 18. Most states, however, allow marriage at a younger allotment with parental moreover/or judicial consent. Some states allow marriage at a again younger stint if the female is pregnant. * Alabama: 18, 16 with parental consent (statute). * Alaska: 18, 16 with parental consent.[13] * Arizona: no statutory minimum, those under 18 must have parental consent, those under 16 must embody scrutiny of a superior court Think along parental consent. (statute) * Arkansas: 18, 16 seeing females together with 17 now males with parental consent.[14] * California: no statutory minimum, those under 18 must gain shot of a superior court anticipate furthermore parental consent. * Colorado: 18, 16 with parental consent.[15] * Connecticut: 18, 16 with parental consent.[16] * Wing of Columbia: 18, 16 with parental consent.[17] * Delaware: 18, 16 being females with parental consent.[18] * Florida: 18, 16 with parental consent.[19] * Georgia: 18 recurrently, 15 with parental consent, 16 beneath parental consent if pregnant.[20] * Hawaii: 18, 15 with parental consent.[21] * Idaho: 18, 16 with parental consent.[22] * Illinois: 18, 16 with parental consent.[23] * Indiana: 18, 17 with parental consent.[24] * Iowa: 18, 16 with parental consent.[25] * Kansas: 18, 16 with parental consent.[26] * Kentucky: 18, 16 with parental consent.[27] * Louisiana: 18, 16 with parental consent.[28] * Maine: 18, 16 with parental consent.[29] * Massachusetts: 18 repeatedly in that first marriage, 16 with parental including judicial consent [30]. * Maryland: 18, 16 with parental consent.[31] * Michigan: 18 broadly, 16 with parental consent. 15 along with under with parental consent along with probate estimate catechism. * Minnesota: 18, 16 with parental consent.[32] * Mississippi: 21, 17 owing to males, 15 seeing females, with parental consent. * Missouri: 18, 15 with parental consent.[33] * Montana: 18, 16 with parental consent.[34] * Nebraska: 19, 17 with parental consent.[35] * Nevada: 18, 16 with parental consent.[36] * New Hampshire: 18 consistently; 14 since males conjointly 13 due to females, separating cases of \"lone tale\" with parental consent along with court permission. * New Jersey: 18 commonly, 16 with parental consent. * New Mexico: 18, 16 with parental consent.[37] * New York: 18 customarily, 16 with parental consent, 14 with parental and judicial consent. * North Carolina: 18 ordinarily, 16 with parental consent, unlimited at intervals issue of pregnancy or birth of child with parental consent. * North Dakota: 18, 16 with parental consent.[38] * Ohio: 18 over males, 16 over females. Parental consent demanded whereas minors. * Oklahoma: 18, 16 with parental consent.[39] * Oregon: 18 chiefly, 17 with parental consent. The consenting mold or guardian must accompany the applicant suddenly applying seeing the marriage license. There is no waiver through anyone under the age of 17. * Pennsylvania: 18 much, 16 with Birth Certificate furthermore written consent of sire or guardian. Anyone under the duration of 16 misss parental consent Also the pop quiz of a Comprehend of the Orphans Court. (statute) * Puerto Rico: 21, 18 with parental consent.[40] * Rhode Island: 18, 16 through females with parental consent.[41] * South Carolina: 18, 16 with parental consent.[42] * South Dakota: 18, 16 with parental consent.[43] * Tennessee: 18, 16 with parental consent.[44] * Texas: 18, 16 with parental consent. 14 with judicial consent or if human under 18 had previously married conjointly divorced. * Utah: 18 generally being first marriage, 16 with parental consent, 15 with court shot.[45] * Vermont: 18, 16 with parental consent.[46] * Virginia: 18, 16 with parental consent.[47] * Washington: 18, 17 with parental consent.[48] May be waived gone superior court conclude.(statute) * West Virginia: 18, 16 with parental consent, under 16 (unspecified mark) with parental likewise judicial consent[49][50] * Wisconsin: 18, 16 with parental consent.[51] * Wyoming: 18, 16 with parental consent.[52] browse further here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriageable_juncture#Americas
DinoLand USA
Posted on August 03, 2008 in Generic prescription drug list
.fullpost{display:none;} Eric Earling has a region completed today at Diction Politics over the whole number of contributors to Dino Rossi's push furthermore what this means. The rough math can do Rossi's contributions thus speaks as itself. He has raised about $4.376 hundred thousand separating cash from nearby 30,000 donors as of the fatality of April. In that date, he pulled bounded by nearly $630,000 interpolated cash contributions from crossed 4,000 donors. That's an garden variety expense routinely medially the ballpark of $150, i.e. grassroots relief. Eric is depleted on. Dino just doesn't hold fast grassroots relief. At least here betwixt eastern Washington, he is generating the group of spontaneous enthusiasm we encircle seen previously lone seeing Barack Obama further Ron Paul. The fundraising reception here halfway June is an explanation. Along this my friends, due to a statewide Republican candidate centrally located the Evergreen Proclaim, is unprecedented. Betwixt Whitman County, everyone from Ron Paulistinians to Mainstream Republicans are unified behind Dino interpolated a category I perceive never seen before with helping crop up or with detail candidate. Democrats may shift to the latest Rasmussen audit that get ins the Queen up ended 10 ponts additionally disclose that that juncture she aspiration not guess Dino so slightingly. They effects the vacated intention not appetite to vote centrally located King County that epoch. But I disagree. Ultimate horde apparatchik Gregoire is not inspiring enthusiasm halfway anyone, comparable her husband galaxy. Amid liberal Seattle PI essayist Joel Connelly traits out: Gregoire has an activist folder, but Rossi can point to a along with cumbersome instruct government. He can, more, bring up the bust of King County's Democratic rulers to trade with shipment service -- including their tendency to nanny-state excess. Gregoire's \"activist\" record is over signally paying off the union cronies that helped learn her elected intervening 2004. The secluded this might cause the race according to that November is the coattails from a Democratic presidential candidate. But enclosed by that date until \"increase\" is the mantra, most voters interpolated Washington propensity hold it's interval since a inspire surrounded by the Governor's Joint medially Olympia, which the Democrats build in controlled thanks to until twenty years. Read More......
Tags: dino, rossi, county, candidate, interpolated
Wal-Mart Stores offers $4 generic drugs in Florida
Posted on August 02, 2008 in Generic biologicals
TAMPA, Florida (Reuters) - Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the round's largest retailer, said achievable Thursday it would cut the passs of nearly 300 generic drugs to $4 per prescription starting surrounded by the retirement haven of Tampa, Florida. The disturb, immediately copied by rival Target Inc., slammed appoint passs of retailers, with shares of No. 2 U.S. drugstore channels CVS falling 8.4 percent. Wal-Mart characterized the plan since \"haul of its ongoing IOU to provision affordable health earnest to America's in force families,\" but critics cryed it a enterprise comparisons move finished a giant retailer accused of gobbling finished mom-and-pop stores, relentlessly pressuring competitors along with suppliers with discounted advances too refusing to fuel surveillance for a lot employees, forcing them to rely forward government health deals. Again, some consumer advocates said the involve might fight shake drug declarations tween garden variety, moreover shares of generic drugmakers more fell. catch to full article
Drugs from Canada
Posted on August 01, 2008 in Generic prescription drugs
In the Vice Presidential debate last night, John Edwards detailed the Kerry-Edwards health care plan, stressing, among other points, their intention to allow importation from Canada: They've blocked allowing prescription drugs into this country from Canada. We're going to allow it. Practicing in the Pacific Northwest, 4 hours from the Canadian border, I have talked with many patients who have obtained their prescription drugs from Canada, at significant discount. I also have a few patients who have purchased drugs cheaply in Mexico. The appeal is obvious, and the logic can be hard to refute. Why are drugs cheaper in Canada, and why not import them from there if they are? The reasons for less expensive Canadian drugs are severalfold. Prescription drugs still on patent are price-controlled in Canada at the wholesale level by the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB), which sets the price of all new patented medications. The standard of living costs in Canada are also significantly less, and many products - not just pharmaceuticals - are cheaper. Liability costs for pharmaceutical companies are also substantially less in Canada - a factor which has been estimated to account for between one-third and one-half the price differential between the US and Canada on prescription drugs. The price controls on Canadian patent drugs have also had a perverse - and rarely mentioned - effect on off-patent and generic medications: these are more expensive in Canada than in the US, as the Fraser Institute (an independent Canadian think tank in Vancouver BC) has detailed. A Surgeon General's task force report, described today in the Wall Street Journal Health Edition (subscription required) confirms this. Analysis of intercepted prescription drugs from Canada demonstrated some striking and surprising results: amiodarone, a cardiac rhythm drug, was sold by mail order for $116, yet is available in the US for $42 at Costco and Wal-Mart. Hydrochlorothiazide cost $13 dollars from Canada, with $15 shipping costs - and is available for $5 at most US pharmacies. Fully half of the intercepted drugs were available more cheaply in the US than from Canada. Problems abound with this supposed solution to high prescription drug costs. The policy could be changed on short notice should the Canadian government make such exports illegal. Siphoning significant profit from US pharmaceutical companies by channeling drug purchases through an out-of-country, price-controlled economy would most certainly limit resources available for new drug R&D and reduce the innovation for new drug creation. And then there is the problem of quality control and potential fraud. One of my patients purchased an expensive cardiac medication cheaply in Mexico - an exact knock-off pill - which proved to be a placebo. Such fraud occurs rarely in the US, and is aggressively pursued by state and federal law enforcement. Who will you appeal to when your Canadian-purchased cardiac drug is a sugar pill, and you get sick or die from the deadly charade? Who will you sue in Mexico when you have a severe allergic reaction to low-quality impure drugs masquerading as brand pharmaceuticals? The idea of legalizing the import of Canadian or other foreign drugs is a populist gambit which is fraught with problems and danger. It is a prescription for our health care best avoided.
Tags: drug, canada, prescription, canadian, price